Last week, I introduced this five-part series on writing
battles, wars, and fighting into your story. I also offered reasons why more
than just fantasy writers would find this useful.
Today, I’d like to discuss what battles really are, why so
many people write them wrong, and give a few examples of battles and war in
stories that work well.
Reality: War isn’t Glorious
There’s this trope in books and movies (especially in
fantasy books and action-adventure motion pictures) where the fighting is shown
as “cool”. It’s accompanied by an epic soundtrack or an inspirational speech
which are followed by long bouts of conflict in which the main character kills
with ease and there’s always room for movement and one-on-one fighting.
What’s wrong with this trope?
Pretty much everything.
Let’s break it down:
1)
Fighting is not cool. Violence and death and pain are not
cool. It’s not okay that our
society has chosen to make war and battle good
things. We’re not supposed to be happy
about the fighting, are we?
2)
Why do we always need inspirational speeches? In
real life, I’ve heard like… two inspirational speeches, and neither of them
were that great. One was actually just a bunch of meaningless fluff that was
meant to rile people up and get them excited, and the other fell a bit flat
because the speaker wasn’t that great of a speaker. So. Where do these
inspirational speeches come from? The
writer. How can I tell? Because it
sounds like the character (who’s probably had like two minutes to prepare) has
actually taken weeks to make every word count. That’s not realistic.
Battles aren’t preluded by the general standing at the front of a crowd of
thousands and shouting words that everyone can somehow hear. No, they’re
precluded by a bunch of men giving orders to other men, all of whom are close
enough to hear them.
3)
Not to pick on movies for a moment, but I’ve
discovered that the best war/action movies have little to no music during the
battles. For example, the Bourne Trilogy
has a lot of violence and fighting in it, and during these scenes there’s very
little music. Same goes for Saving
Private Ryan. Other action movies, on the other hand, tend to have a lot of
dramatic or epic music (examples including The
Hobbit trilogy and “Pretty-Much-Every-Superhero-Movie-Ever”). The power of a battle is not in how epic you
can make it sound, but how real you
can make it sound. Being able to
draw in your audience (whether it’s readers or watchers) by the sounds of
battle means being real with your
sensory information.
4)
I’ll talk later about the way in which main
characters always seem to be able to kill dozens without breaking a sweat, but
I’d like to point out here that it makes very little sense and statistical odds
are always stacked against this. Just… just saying.
5)
I want to point out a realism of battles for a
moment: battles take place in relatively
small spaces when the number of people fighting is concerned. Books almost
never show this. They never show (with few exceptions) the way that only those
in the very front actually get a chance at hitting the enemy, that there’s no
place for random duels to take place, for characters to have conversation. They
don’t show the grappling and struggling for the upper hand in visceral ways. Instead,
there’s giant bubbles where characters can fight one-on-one and duel and talk
and they can hear each other perfectly well and can show emotion and use fancy maneuvers
and footwork without having to worry that someone behind them will accidentally
hit them with an axe or throw a grenade at their feet.
The reality of war is this: it’s not pretty, and it’s not glorious.
Reality: We Write War Wrong
I realize this is a serious topic, but can we stop and
admire that heading? Say that twenty
times fast.
Yeah, I heard you mess up, don’t pretend you didn’t.
Anyway.
The heading (alliterating at it is) is true: few people
write war well. There are three basic things we get distracted by or hampered
by:
First, we get stuck
in the trope I describe above. It’s hard work, writing a battle, and it’s
so easy to fall into that trope of “oh, I need an inspirational speech to tell
my readers about my theme” and then “well I need my main character to survive,
and to fight this person and this one and talk to that one and…” before we know
it, we’re swept off into the trope and we can be writers of poor battles before
we even realize it.
That’s not a good thing.
Second, we don’t do
our research. We get lazy. Sure,
we’re writing a battle in the civil war, or in medieval Europe or futuristic
Canada, but who needs to research? I mean not you and I, right?
Wrong.
Without research, your battle will turn out awful. There’s no way around that. It will. I speak from experience: no one can write a well-written battle
without research. I’ve tried, and I’ve seen others try time and time again.
Every single time, it turns out poorly.
Third, we get
squeamish. Here’s the truth about battle: it’s ugly. Not the ugliness I talked about a while back, but visceral, brutal violence. It’s deadly,
deafening, painful. We don’t want to
describe war in its reality because we don’t want to have to deal with that
level of brutality and wrongness.
Humans don’t like war. We don’t like violence.
However, here’s the deal: presenting war as anything other than the honest reality doesn’t make
that reality go away. Instead, it makes war seem less wrong, less violent,
less ugly. It pulls away from the truth and creates a naïve lie.
Reality: We Can Write Battles Well
This post seems pretty hopeless, doesn’t it? I mean, I keep
pointing out all the ways we write battles wrong. I’m also speaking in such a
way that I include myself, because I’m also guilty of all of these things.
So….
How do we do this right?
Well, let’s look at a few examples of books and movies that
did it right. One of the easiest ways
to learn is to observe those who know what they’re doing.
I’d like to get two of my go-to examples out of the way
right away: Saving Private Ryan and Hacksaw Ridge are two of my favorite war
movies. They’re both hard to watch, and one of them is known as one of the most
brutal movies ever (well, it used to be… some are more violent, but not in the
same way).
These two movies are set in World War Two, and do excellent jobs
in showing war for what it is: violent, bloody, vile, brutal. It shows that war
is not cool, it’s real and it’s hard. Both of these show war in all its violence, which can be hard
to watch.
To get a few more movie examples out of the way, 3:10 to Yuma is one of my favorite
examples of fighting where the main character suffers just as much as the rest.
He’s not immune to bullets or knives, he’s the opposite of invincible. Not to
mention the ending is so unexpected and realistic and… yeah, I won’t spoil it.
Go watch it. Do it.
To turn to a couple books with fantastic battle scenes, Killer Angels (and its prequel, Gods and Generals) is a great book about
the American civil war, specifically about Gettysburg. It shows that soldiers
aren’t just masses of screaming entities hacking away at each other, but that both sides contain human beings with
lives and families and dreams.
It’s a hard tale to read, because you want to cheer for both
sides (regardless of your opinions on the Civil War) and neither at the same
time because war isn’t about who wins, it’s about who lives.
There are many, many examples out there of books that do battle
well. Not near as many as there are examples of poorly written battles, but
there are examples if you know where
to look. For more intimate, small “battles”, try The Raven Boys Cycle. For fantasy battles (and excellent commentary
on war in general), try The Wheel of Time
series.
Battles can be hard to write. They take time and effort and
a willingness to put yourself at risk of writing something visceral. It’s
saying “war isn’t pretty, and here’s why”, and letting yourself write that
ugliness.
It can be a work of art, when done right.
No comments:
Post a Comment