Everyone knows about Tolkien, right?
There are very few people in first world countries who haven’t at least heard of the name. No,
not everyone has read Tolkien’s writing… but at the very least, everyone knows
someone who has. He’s often regarded as one of the most influential fantasy
writers in history. Every novelist yearns to be compared to him in a favorable
manor. The quickest way to market a book (as much as I dislike it because it
sets the bar far too high for anyone to reach) is to feature a review which
praises said book as “the next saga in the footsteps of Tolkien” or some such
phrase.
Everyone knows about The
Hobbit and Lord of the Rings, and
your more “hardcore” fans have read The
Silmarillion and The Unfinished Tales
and so forth.
They’re fantastic books, but they’re not what I’m here to
talk about today.
See, Tolkien was also known as a linguist. He created languages. Over twenty of them.
I think we all, at some point in our lives, aspire to create
a language. Young kids “create” languages to speak with one another in “code”
when the adults are around. As we grow, we take foreign language classes in
school. Then some of us try to create languages for novels.
The problem is… so very few of those languages work.
Why?
Let’s find out:
The Power of Language
Right now, you’re reading a blog post in English. It’s the
English language, of the dialect of… well, me. Most people have their own
special twist on a language. The way they speak it, how they pronounce the
words, how they form sentences and paragraphs. We pick and choose our style out
of hundreds and thousands of styles we interact with each day.
Language changes on a daily basis, as people transform and
mold it to fit their needs. Sure, parts of it remain constant, but as a whole
it is always absorbing new ideas and themes and words and meaning.
Without language, we couldn’t communicate with each other.
Every aspect of communication is a form of language. Whether spoken, written,
or gestured, it’s an attempt to exchange ideas and desires with one another.
Our lives would be rather boring without language. We’d
never interact with one another, we’d never learn or grow or care. Without language, there would be no stories.
Language, then, is immensely powerful. What we do with our
words has an enormous impact on those around us, and on ourselves. The stories
we tell and the word we write can change lives and make people think.
It may seem a logical conclusion, then, to want to include
this powerful idea in your novels. If you’re creating a world for your story
(be it fantasy or science fiction), then you naturally have to consider
language.
There are over 6,500 languages spoken on earth. Sure, some
of them are quickly going extinct (as happens when a form of communication
becomes less viable and important). But still.
6,500 languages.
Is it unrealistic, then to write a story in which every
person your character meets speaks the same language?
Of course not.
What do we do, then?
The Problem with Language
The most obvious solution would be to simply smash your
keyboard whenever you need to have someone speak a foreign, fantasy language.
Just follow the standard recipe for a fantasy language and
go:
Ajkgnalkj dnglsjdhq aigi hgil dhi wpreiiow.
Which, in case it wasn’t obvious, is Geitu for “Creating
languages by keyboard-smashing is idiotic.”
Obviously.
Why is this wrong?
It’s crystal clear
that this isn’t a real language.
I don’t have time, this post, to explain why, but I’d like
you to look at the second “word” in that sentence. Try to say it.
Turns out, it’s impossible to say it. When your brain sees
that sort of thing in a novel, it glosses right over it and searches for
context clues to explain what in the world that mumbo jumbo is supposed to be.
Another reason why this is wrong: it looks and sounds the same no matter who speaks it. This
“language” has no room for dialect and accent and individual voice. Why?
Because my brain doesn’t interpret it. If I don’t interpret it at all, how can
I pull out an accent and an individual speaker?
Solution? Don’t keyboard smash.
What’s left, then, is to create an actual language.
How?
I’ve dabbled a little in the art of con-lang, and let me
tell you: creating your own language takes a lot of work. Language is so complex that you can spend years developing it and never
finish. You have to consider everything from the bottom up: starting with
phenomes (basic sound units) and morphemes (the smallest units with meaning)
and work your way up to the creation of syntax, semantics, written form, spoken
form, etc.
Sound overwhelming?
It is.
Turns out, we don’t have the time for creating a whole
language. We’re not Tolkien, we’re not linguists. So… what do we do instead?
Language Substitutes
The first thing you don’t
want to do is avoid fantasy/sci-fi languages altogether. They are realistic and they can add depth to your world.
When they’re realistic.
One of the first substitutes you can make is the reference-to-English substitute. This
involves telling the reader: “they spoke [this] language” and then showing the
rest of the conversation in English (or whatever language you’re writing your
book in).
This is commonly done in novels which take place in this
world, but cross multiple language barriers.
For instance, War and
Peace – when translated – involves three language: English (the translated
narrative and most of the dialogue), some French, and some Russian. Because
many of the characters are Aristocracy, they switch languages to make a point,
make a pun, or to sound a particular way (haughty, knowledgeable, etc.).
Sure, the translation includes some of those switches (which
I’ll cover in a moment), but there are instances of this kind:
The two began to speak
in French for the finish of their conversation. [dialogue in English]
That’s not a direct quote, just so you know. It lets us know
that another language is being spoken, but gives us the convenience of not
having to puzzle out what in the world is being said.
Next, you might consider the minimal development language. In which you (regardless of its
realistic qualities) building a language with the bare minimum of knowledge.
I’ve done this before, but I can’t claim it came out well.
You use an alphabet that already exists (English, for
instance) and build a series of “roots” and “prefixes” and “suffixes” at
random. Then you can combine these to form words, and the words to form sentences.
For ease, you can use the grammar/syntax of the language you borrow the
alphabet from. Sure, this can look cheesy, like the keyboard smash, but it can come across as more real.
The main problem you have to avoid with this sort of
language is the “fantasy sound clichés”. Feminine words that end in “-a” or
“-ia” are so cliché you can spot the fantasy novel out of a list of names. Evil
words are always made with harsh sounded consonants and deep-throated growls.
And so forth. The “featured” post for this week talks about this, too, so check
it out for more details on that sort of thing.
One thing you should consider, however, is the use of a
direct translation following a language. Simply putting in parentheses what was
said during the exchange may sound… cheesy, but your reader will thank you.
Don’t think it’s worth it? Tolstoy obviously did. In the
translated version of War and Peace, there
are snippets of dialogue (no more than four sentences) which are kept in the
original Russian or French. These are always
followed by an English translation in parentheses. And it never robs the
dialogue of authenticity and it never pulls the reader out of the narrative.
You’ll be fine.
The final language substitute is this: show diversity elsewhere. Building and using languages is a form of
diversity. It reflects this world in fantastic ways, but it’s also one of the
hardest ways to do so. It takes time and effort and knowledge to truly do this
well, and sometimes… it’s not worth it.
“But Aidan, the readers will question of all my characters
speak the same language when they’re from different countries!”
No they won’t.
There are dozens of good fantasy and science fiction novels
out there where no one speaks a fantasy or science fiction language. Sure,
they’re mentioned, but they’re not spoken. Everything happens in English.
Why?
Because the reader accepts that you’re trying to tell a
story, and it’s not worth distracting them to have one instance of worldbuilding be super complex and realistic.
Instead of focusing on language, focus on the other areas
you can show diversity and realism. When
you make up for the lack of language by excellence in two or three other areas,
your reader will come along for the ride, no questions asked.
After all, the point is to tell a good story, right?
We don’t need
fantasy languages to do that. We don’t
need our science fiction to be riddled with aliens speaking with clicks and
whistles.
We need good stories.
Related Posts:
Featured Post:
Inventing a Language That’s More Than Stock Fantasy Sounds(Gabrielle Schwabauer)
As a side note and forewarning, Friday’s blog post will be
postponed until Saturday evening because I’ll be at a writer’s workshop this
week and so will be unable to post.
*grin* Thank you very muchly. This has bothered me before.
ReplyDelete*thumbs up*
DeleteActually, if I were not taking online classes these past three years, I would never have heard of Tolkien's existence.
ReplyDeleteOh, interesting. Online classes do always have their bonuses, right? ;)
DeleteInteresting post. The only time I ever tried adding a make up language into a book was when I was eleven. Instead of mashing the keyboard or making up words I just spelled all the words backwards. I was actually kinda proud of it back then. *sighs*
ReplyDelete~Keara
Eheheh, well. At least you weren't smashing the keyboard, right? :P
Delete