But what do you use for
those first few pages?
It’s quite common to use a prologue. Simply put, a prologue
is a short [sometimes long] ‘pre-chapter’ before chapter one. These can be used
as powerful attention grabbers, but also as areas to dump information on the reader,
do cheesy introductions, spy in the villain for no real reason, and/or to show
us something the author thinks we need prior to getting to the real
story.
Prologues rarely have some form of ‘okay’. They either stink
like hogs or shine like your grandmum’s best china. I’ve read only one prologue
which fit the term ‘okay’, and even then I didn’t like it.
What makes a good
prologue?
Well, it appears to depend on the genre. Readers for
different genres will expect different things, and some prologues don’t fit
certain genres.
For instance, most historical fiction has no prologue. Those
that do have prologues are often boring, and filled with background information
about such-and-such who died and are irrelevant except as some form of cynical
symbolism. Dystopias (the few that have prologues that work) tend to have very
short [one or two page] prologues that are very tense, mysterious, and make the
reader ask questions. This sort of prologue
- the dark, tense, attention-grabbing kind – works well for almost any genre.
There is one kind of prologue, however, that is an
exception. The epic fantasy prologue
is, generally, very long. Some, such as Robert Jordan’s The Wheel of Time have prologues stretching anywhere from twenty to
sixty pages.
*low whistling*
However, this sort of prologue becomes, in the reader’s
mind, a sort of chapter one.
In fact, any good prologue should act as a chapter, standing
alone by itself. If the author could rename it ‘chapter one’, it will probably work.
At this point, the author should weigh the pros and cons of keeping it as the
prologue or just make it chapter one.
The basic rule of thumb* I follow: “If it wouldn’t work as a
first chapter, it shouldn’t open your novel.”
Why?
Because everyone goes into your book looking for a beginning. And if your prologue doesn’t
begin the story, but simply set it up, they won’t walk away happy.
In summation:
Never use a prologue
to dump information. This includes information on the story, the world, the
pre-story history, and the characters (especially the villan2).
Always treat the
prologue as a first chapter. If it doesn’t work as one, figure out why, and
consider changing it so it does.
The prologue should begin
the story, not set it up.
A prologue must be concise
and gripping. If your prologue rambles on forever and ever about one thing,
you’ll lose the reader just as fast as if it was a foreword or preface.
After a long period of observing people, I’ve discovered
that people either hate prologues or love them. To give you a generalization:
fantasy readers tend to enjoy and read prologues more than others. And yet
another: authors dislike prologues more than your average reader.
If there’s one part of a novel that is often overlooked, it’s
the epilogue. Not because all epilogues are excellently written and thereby
deserve no criticism, but because they normally contain very little
critique-able information.
Almost every epilogue is used as a ‘flash-forward’; it’s a
chance for the author to show the audience what happens, say, seventeen years
after the conflict resolves.
I’ve found very few unsatisfactory epilogues in my browsing
of literature, but here are a few marks of those less-than-marketable ones:
-They drag on
forever3. This is a hyperbole, as there are no books that stretch
into eternity, but it’s still true. Often times an epilogue will grow boring
after the first few pages. Why? Because the conflict is over. We’re reading about the characters we loved, but
older and changed. Maybe even matured and wizened. Chances are a few of them
have fallen in love and gotten married.
Ew.
-The epilogue ruins a
perfect ending. Imagine this: in the last chapter, the main character is
sitting at a table with his best friend and the love interest. Maybe they’re in
some tavern, drinking mulled cider and talking about how the villain is crushed
forever, and all is right with the world. The best friend says something witty,
goes to get another drink, and the lovebird get their moment. Queue the cheesy
music and/or the theme song, and pan the camera prose toward the frosted
front windows of the hole-in-the-wall inn.
The reader is happy, and ready for the credits.
BAM. We’re rushed twenty years into the future, listening to
the aged hero telling his children about the time he destroyed the castle of
his arch-
Wait.
We had the perfect
last scene.
Not only that, but we already know the main character
destroyed that castle. We watched him do it, even as he wept because his sister
was trapped under the rubble. We probably even had his future with the love
interest planned out, and named all his kids.
A good epilogue wraps up loose ends. It gives the reader
satisfaction, brings the conflict to a close, and lets the reader get a glimpse
and what will be, after the story finishes. It never ruins a perfect last
chapter, it never drags on. It gives us a few last thoughts to ponder, and it
always –always- makes the reader want just one more sentence.
What about you? Do
you like prologues and epilogues? What are some examples of your favorites?
Share in the comments below!
*I never have understood this phrase… why do thumbs have
rules?
2I say this because there are countless prologues that
try and be clever and shows us a quick glimpse at the villain. It’s more cliché
than the thin air your Mentor vanishes into.
3there are very few exceptions where a long epilogue is
a good epilogue. For instance, War and
Peace by Leo Tolstoy has not one, but two
epilogues, both of which are rather lengthy. But then, Tolstoy can get away
with that when his book is already going on fourteen hundred pages.
I hate prologues, and honestly only skim read them.
ReplyDelete